The significance of the categories of Spinoza’s ethics for cultural historical research La importancia de las categorías de la ética de Spinoza para la investigación histórico-cultura

Authors

  • Bernd Fichtner

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20435/938

Keywords:

Cultural praxis, cultural comparison, cultural differences.

Abstract

The starng-point for this presentaon is a joint Brazilian-German research project on “Reading and Wring as a Cultural Praxis of Youth”. This was an empirical qualitative study on the basis of open“dialogical interviews” (Bakhtin) which focused on this praxis of youths. In addition to Bakhtin as amethodological perspective, Lurija’s concept of a “romantic science” became fundamental to ourproject1. The goals of our research were as follows: 1. To understand reading and writing intheirinterrelationship as a specific form of cultural praxis; 2. To contribute by means of research on thisspecific praxis to the theoretical dimensions of the concept of “cultural praxis” as a symbolicallymediated praxis; 3.To better understand – precisely by means of this praxis on the part of childrenand youths – current changes in reading and writing. To this end, we proceeded from the assumption that children and youths have a particular sensitivity for symbolizing their experiences with regard tonew developments in a society2. 4. We intended to concretize these goals in a “cultural comparison”of this praxis on the part of Brazilian and German youths. With the following remarks, we will not be presenting the project in its entirety, its results, or the discussion thereof. Rather, we would liketo discuss one particular aspect in more detail: the problem of cultural diff erences, the explosivenature of which only became evident in the course of the research process.

References

ASSMANN, A. Lesen als Beleben: Zum Verhältnis von Medium und Imagination. Vortrag,

1999. Available in: <www.ph.uni-heidelberg.de/org/lz/assm.htm>.

BENJAMIN, W. Programm eines proletarischen Kindertheaters 1928. In: . Über Kinder, Jugend und Erziehung. Frankfurt7M: Suhrkamp, 1969. p. 79-86.

COLE, M. Cultural Psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Havard University Press, 1996.

CURLEY, Edwin (Editor and translator). The collected works of Spinoza. Princeton: University Press, 1985. Vol. 1.

LURIJA, A. R. Verso un analisi della personalità concreta. La “scienza romantica”: ritratti non imaginari. In: . Uno sguardo sul passato. Considerazioni retrospettive sulla vita di uno psicologo sovietico. Presentazione di M.S. Vegetti. Firenze: Giunti Barbèra, 1983.

SPINOZA, Benedictus de. A Theologico-Political Treatise [Part I]. Translated by R. H. M. Elwes July, 1997 [Project gutenberg etext 989]. [S.l.: s.n.], 1670.

. Ethik in geometrischer Ordnung dargestellt. Neu übersetzt, herausgegeben , mit einer Einleitung versehen von W. Bartuschat (1999). Lateinisch –Deutsch. Hamburg: Meiner, 1677.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. Denken und Sprechen (1964) Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1934.

Published

2016-04-14

How to Cite

Fichtner, B. (2016). The significance of the categories of Spinoza’s ethics for cultural historical research La importancia de las categorías de la ética de Spinoza para la investigación histórico-cultura. Série-Estudos - Periódico Do Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Educação Da UCDB, 21(41), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.20435/938

Issue

Section

Artigos